linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: input: add Semtech SX951x binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <02ec76f4-5072-4247-b64b-289c9da7ec5f@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 16:03:32 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: David Bauer <mail@...id-bauer.net>,
 Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, Rob Herring
 <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
 <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: input: add Semtech SX951x binding

On 20/05/2025 15:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/05/2025 12:05, David Bauer wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> thanks for the review.
>>
>> On 5/6/25 08:21, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 05/05/2025 22:38, David Bauer wrote:
>>>> Add device-tree binding for the Semtech SX9512/SX9513 family of touch
>>>> controllers with integrated LED driver.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: David Bauer <mail@...id-bauer.net>
>>>
>>> You CC-ed an address, which suggests you do not work on mainline kernel
>>> or you do not use get_maintainers.pl/b4/patman. Please rebase and always
>>> work on mainline or start using mentioned tools, so correct addresses
>>> will be used.
>> I'm a bit unsure what you are referring to - maybe I've set the options
>> for get_maintainer.pl wrong, but i use
>>
>> get_maintainer.pl --nogit --nogit-fallback --norolestats --nol
>>
>> to determine TO recipients and
>>
>> get_maintainer.pl --nogit --nogit-fallback --norolestats --nom
>>
>> for CC destinations.
>>
>> Granted, my tree was a bit out of date but it was from mainline
> 
> Mainline means latest RC or maintainer tree or linux next. v5.0 is not
> mainline anymoer.
> 
>> and after rebase both commands returned consistent results.
>>
>> Hope you can provide me with some guidance there.
> 
> Well, read full reply. It is impossible to get such email address from
> above commands. Such email address does not exist since long time and it
> easy to prove - just git grep for it. No results, so how could it be
> printed by get_maintainers.pl?
> 
> If you disagree then please paste full output of:
> 
> $ git describe
> $ git status
> $ scripts/get_maintainer.pl 0*
> 
> I provided you extensive guideline exactly to avoid further trivial
> discussions about that triviality, so I would really appreciate if you
> followed it.

Huh, I noticed I responded after two weeks so pretty late... Huh,
exactly because of the reason why I asked to use up2date addresses - the
mailbox used in this patchset is not being used/checked/accessed since
long time and kernel since long time has correct address.

Best regards,
Krzysztof