[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fc6f2ac6-c6a5-4661-b5c5-e1cc75a7d955@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 23:53:07 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
Maulik Shah <maulik.shah@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] soc: qcom: qcom_stats: Add QMP support for syncing
ddr stats
On 5/21/25 2:52 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 02:02:11PM +0530, Maulik Shah wrote:
>> Recent SoCs (SM8450 onwards) require QMP command to be sent before reading
>> ddr stats. The duration field of ddr stats will get populated only if QMP
>> command is sent.
>>
>> Add support to send ddr stats freqsync QMP command.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <maulik.shah@....qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_stats.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> @@ -310,6 +329,14 @@ static int qcom_stats_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> qcom_create_subsystem_stat_files(root, config);
>> qcom_create_soc_sleep_stat_files(root, reg, d, config);
>> qcom_create_ddr_stat_files(root, reg, config);
>> + /*
>> + * QMP is used for DDR stats syncing to MSG RAM for recent SoCs (SM8450 onwards).
>> + * The prior SoCs do not need QMP handle as the required stats are already present
>> + * in MSG RAM, provided the DDR_STATS_MAGIC_KEY matches.
>> + */
>> + qcom_stats_qmp = qmp_get(&pdev->dev);
>> + if (IS_ERR(qcom_stats_qmp))
>> + qcom_stats_qmp = NULL;
>
> Don't we need to handle QMP being not probed _yet_? In other words,
> there are several distinct cases:
>
> - No QMP defined, proceed without it
> - QMP defined, not probed yet, return -EPROBE_DEFER here
> - QMP defined, qmp_get() returns an error, return that error code
> - QMP defined, qmp_get() returned valid pointer, proceed with using it.
I was thinking we could get rid of the qcom,qmp get-by-phandle mess
and replace it with a single static global instance.. But it's hard
to determine from the aossqmp driver whether we should ever expect
it to come up. A sufficient discriminator is "is_rpmh", but I'm not
sure we can rely on e.g. cmd_db_ready() to get an answer
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists