[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250521230639.GA1452526@bhelgaas>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 18:06:39 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Jon Pan-Doh <pandoh@...gle.com>,
Karolina Stolarek <karolina.stolarek@...cle.com>,
Weinan Liu <wnliu@...gle.com>,
Martin Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Ben Fuller <ben.fuller@...cle.com>,
Drew Walton <drewwalton@...rosoft.com>,
Anil Agrawal <anilagrawal@...a.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...a.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.ibm.com>,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>,
Kai-Heng Feng <kaihengf@...dia.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>,
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>,
Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 15/17] PCI/AER: Ratelimit correctable and non-fatal
error logging
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 03:33:45PM -0700, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote:
> On 5/20/25 2:50 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > From: Jon Pan-Doh <pandoh@...gle.com>
> >
> > Spammy devices can flood kernel logs with AER errors and slow/stall
> > execution. Add per-device ratelimits for AER correctable and non-fatal
> > uncorrectable errors that use the kernel defaults (10 per 5s). Logging of
> > fatal errors is not ratelimited.
> > + /* Ratelimits for errors */
> > + struct ratelimit_state cor_log_ratelimit;
> > + struct ratelimit_state uncor_log_ratelimit;
>
> Nit: Do you think we should name it as nonfatal_log_ratelimit?
Maybe so. We can always change this internal name, so I guess the
important part is the sysfs filename
("/sys/bus/pci/devices/<dev>/aer/ratelimit_burst_uncor_log").
"ratelimit_burst_nonfatal_log" is not quite parallel with
"ratelimit_burst_cor_log" the way "ratelimit_burst_uncor_log" is.
But it's definitely true that the underlying PCIe Messages are
ERR_COR, ERR_NONFATAL, and ERR_FATAL.
So I think this is more than a nit, and you're right that we should
use "cor" and "nonfatal" somehow.
I'll work on that tomorrow.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists