[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250522180956.1ab86afe@booty>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 18:09:56 +0200
From: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Maarten Lankhorst
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Thomas Zimmermann
<tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter
<simona@...ll.ch>, Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>, Neil Armstrong
<neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Laurent
Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, Jonas Karlman
<jonas@...boo.se>, Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet@...tlin.com>, Thomas
Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/22] drm: convert many bridge drivers from
devm_kzalloc() to devm_drm_bridge_alloc() API
Hi Dmitry,
On Thu, 22 May 2025 16:08:43 +0300
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com> wrote:
> > What to do? Proposed plan:
> >
> > 1. Louis immediately applies the revert (patch 1)
>
> I can't help but notice that both Louis and you have bootlin.com email
> addresses. Granted the lack of responses, can't you ping him internally?
Ah, sure, Louis and I were discussing it together. The question was
quite "which is the correct process to manage an incorrectly-applied
patch?", i.e. whether the revert itself needs to the Reviewed/Acked-by
etc.
Luca
--
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists