linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v22 2/5] arm64: el2_setup.h: Make __init_el2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aC9NhvYzajduVm7y@e133380.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 17:15:02 +0100
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
To: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
	James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
	Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v22 2/5] arm64: el2_setup.h: Make __init_el2_fgt labels
 consistent, again

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 05:27:37PM -0500, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
> 
> Commit 5b39db6037e7 ("arm64: el2_setup.h: Rename some labels to be more
> diff-friendly") reworked the labels in __init_el2_fgt to say what's
> skipped rather than what the target location is. The exception was
> "set_fgt_" which is where registers are written. In reviewing the BRBE
> additions, Will suggested "set_debug_fgt_" where HDFGxTR_EL2 are
> written. Doing that would partially revert commit 5b39db6037e7 undoing
> the goal of minimizing additions here, but it would follow the
> convention for labels where registers are written.
> 
> So let's do both. Branches that skip something go to a "skip" label and
> places that set registers have a "set" label. This results in some
> double labels, but it makes things entirely consistent.
> 
> While we're here, the SME skip label was incorrectly named, so fix it.
> 
> Reported-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Cc: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
> ---
> This one can be applied even if the rest of the series is not.
> 
> v22:
>  - New patch
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h | 10 +++++++---
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
> index ebceaae3c749..30f57b0334a3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
> @@ -204,19 +204,21 @@
>  	orr	x0, x0, #(1 << 62)
>  
>  .Lskip_spe_fgt_\@:
> +
> +.Lset_debug_fgt_\@:

Dangling label?  There doesn't seem to be any branch to it in this
series, unless I've missed something.

[...]

Cheers
---Dave