[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <vf7fb7jxxwy25wzow4pbzvh26xqd7hkx4edqmcts2tzoyrnxqs@u3lev7ergjb2>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 22:09:13 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Alexander Wilhelm <alexander.wilhelm@...termo.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] soc: qcom: fix endianness for QMI header
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 04:35:30PM +0200, Alexander Wilhelm wrote:
> The members of QMI header have to be swapped on big endian platforms. Use
> __le16 types instead of u16 ones.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Wilhelm <alexander.wilhelm@...termo.com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/qcom/qmi_encdec.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/soc/qcom/qmi_interface.c | 6 +++---
> include/linux/soc/qcom/qmi.h | 6 +++---
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Just out of curiosity, is there a usecase for running QMI helpers on BE
platforms?
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists