lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALHNRZ9Hkz3_yJZmzJJR9jaJdYpxO2FddrXG_V1GZMLp=jGCuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 17:04:10 -0500
From: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: palmas: Allow building as a module

On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 12:42 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On 22/05/2025 17:52, Aaron Kling wrote:
> > The driver works fine as a module, so allowing building as such. This
> > drops the driver specific init in favor of the module macro which does
> > the same, plus handling exit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpio/Kconfig       |  2 +-
> >  drivers/gpio/gpio-palmas.c | 10 +++++-----
> >  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> > index f2c39bbff83a33dcb12b2d32aa3ebc358a0dd949..be5d823516d0e2bff4b4231dac6a82bf10887118 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> > @@ -1464,7 +1464,7 @@ config GPIO_MAX77650
> >         These chips have a single pin that can be configured as GPIO.
> >
> >  config GPIO_PALMAS
> > -     bool "TI PALMAS series PMICs GPIO"
> > +     tristate "TI PALMAS series PMICs GPIO"
> >       depends on MFD_PALMAS
> >       help
> >         Select this option to enable GPIO driver for the TI PALMAS
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-palmas.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-palmas.c
> > index 28dba7048509a3ef9c7972c1be53ea30adddabb0..c70782be502b2719bb30cf3e40065c89ecec3cc2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-palmas.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-palmas.c
> > @@ -191,9 +191,9 @@ static struct platform_driver palmas_gpio_driver = {
> >       .driver.of_match_table = of_palmas_gpio_match,
> >       .probe          = palmas_gpio_probe,
> >  };
> > +module_platform_driver(palmas_gpio_driver);
> >
> > -static int __init palmas_gpio_init(void)
> > -{
> > -     return platform_driver_register(&palmas_gpio_driver);
> > -}
> > -subsys_initcall(palmas_gpio_init);
> > +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:palmas_gpio");
>
>
> Drop. You miss proper MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE instead. You should not need
> MODULE_ALIAS() in normal cases. If you need it, usually it means your
> device ID table is wrong (e.g. misses either entries or
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE()). MODULE_ALIAS() is not a substitute for
> incomplete ID table.

I just copied from the other drivers for this mfd, like clk-palmas,
palmas-regulator, etc. I don't know if there's a reason these others
have aliases or not, but they all have it. I'll update this patch per
the suggestions and send a v2.

Aaron

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ