[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250522075553.GG24938@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 09:55:53 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@...utronix.de>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] x86/cpu: Use a new feature flag for 5 level paging
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 05:23:37PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> 4) Drivers having access to CPUID is just wrong. We've had issues
> with that in the past because drivers evaluated CPUID themself and
> missed that the core code had stuff disabled.
I had this patch that read the module instructions and failed loading if
they used 'fancy' instructions. Do you want me to revive that?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists