linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] media: dt-bindings: mt9m114: Add slew-rate DT-binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b8058efa-ce38-4615-9e43-43d1fd114b39@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 16:08:47 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Mathis Foerst <mathis.foerst@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
 Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@...il.com>,
 Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
 Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
 Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
 imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 manuel.traut@...com, mathis.foerst@...hlke.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] media: dt-bindings: mt9m114: Add slew-rate
 DT-binding

On 22/05/2025 16:06, Mathis Foerst wrote:
> The MT9M114 supports the different slew rates (0 to 7) on the output pads.
> At the moment, this is hardcoded to 7 (the fastest rate).
> The user might want to change this values due to EMC requirements.
> 
> Add the 'slew-rate' property to the MT9M114 DT-bindings for selecting
> the desired slew rate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathis Foerst <mathis.foerst@...com>
> ---

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
"received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
tags received on the version they apply.

Please read:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof