[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d86594f5-c6d0-4692-b1ec-41d76f947b7e@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 11:08:43 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Rujra Bhatt <braker.noob.kernel@...il.com>, shuah@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linux.dev, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests: timers: valid-adjtimex: fix coding style
issues
On 5/22/25 21:59, Rujra Bhatt wrote:
>
> This patch corrects minor coding style issues to comply with the Linux kernel coding style:
>
> - Align closing parentheses to match opening ones in printf statements.
> - Break long lines to keep them within the 100-column limit.
>
> These changes address warnings reported by checkpatch.pl and do not
> affect functionality.
>
> changes in v2 :
> - Resubmitted the patch with a properly formatted commit message,
> following patch submission guidelines, as suggested by Shuah Khan.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rujra Bhatt <braker.noob.kernel@...il.com>
Sorry - I didn't realize these are all coding style related
printf - I am no longer concerned about the length of print
statements.
It is too much churn with little benefit.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists