linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] selftests: timers: valid-adjtimex: fix coding style issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAG+54DajW=1cKGaHDg84RextOvB1FQtSJU8VwrWYNfuoHBigKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 05:21:42 +0530
From: Rujra Bhatt <braker.noob.kernel@...il.com>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: shuah@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests: timers: valid-adjtimex: fix coding style issues

Respected Shuah,


On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 10:38 PM Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On 5/22/25 21:59, Rujra Bhatt wrote:
> >
> > This patch corrects minor coding style issues to comply with the Linux kernel coding style:
> >
> > - Align closing parentheses to match opening ones in printf statements.
> > - Break long lines to keep them within the 100-column limit.
> >
> > These changes address warnings reported by checkpatch.pl and do not
> > affect functionality.
> >
> > changes in v2 :
> > - Resubmitted the patch with a properly formatted commit message,
> > following patch submission guidelines, as suggested by Shuah Khan.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rujra Bhatt <braker.noob.kernel@...il.com>
>
> Sorry - I didn't realize these are all coding style related
> printf - I am no longer concerned about the length of print
> statements.
>
> It is too much churn with little benefit.
>

Thank you for the feedback , also understanding your perspective.
For future contributions, I will focus on more substantive changes,
unless stylistic
fixes are explicitly requested.

thank you,
regards,
Rujra Bhatt