[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e50abba6c962772c73342bacf20fb87dc99dd542.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 15:24:30 +1000
From: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman
<mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy
<christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>,
"Ritesh
Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V"
<aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva"
<gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Marco Elver
<elver@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
Andrey
Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor
<nathan@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>,
Nick
Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>,
Bill Wendling
<morbo@...gle.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/14] powerpc: Handle KCOV __init vs inline
mismatches
On Thu, 2025-05-22 at 21:39 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> When KCOV is enabled all functions get instrumented, unless
> the __no_sanitize_coverage attribute is used. To prepare for
> __no_sanitize_coverage being applied to __init functions, we have to
> handle differences in how GCC's inline optimizations get resolved.
> For
> s390 this requires forcing a couple functions to be inline with
I assume you mean powerpc here, though I'm sure my employer is happy
that you're at least confusing us with IBM's other architecture :)
--
Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra
ajd@...ux.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited
Powered by blists - more mailing lists