linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] spi: spi-qpic-snand: avoid memory corruption

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87r00b23ik.fsf@bootlin.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 10:13:39 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,  Md Sadre Alam
 <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>,  Varadarajan Narayanan
 <quic_varada@...cinc.com>,  Sricharan Ramabadhran
 <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>,  Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
  Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,  linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
  linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,  linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] spi: spi-qpic-snand: avoid memory corruption

Hi Gabor,

On 25/05/2025 at 19:05:34 +02, Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@...il.com> wrote:

> The 'spi-qpic-nand' driver may cause memory corruption under some
> circumstances. The first patch in the series changes the driver to
> avoid that, whereas the second adds some sanity checks to the common
> QPIC code in order to make detecting such errors easier in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@...il.com>
> ---
> Gabor Juhos (2):
>       spi: spi-qpic-snand: reallocate BAM transactions
>       mtd: nand: qpic_common: prevent out of bounds access of BAM
> arrays

Are these two paches related somehow? Or can we apply them in
two different trees? If yes, please send the patches separately, which
eases our work.

Thanks,
Miquèl