linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] ASoC: aoa: Use helper function for_each_child_of_node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <23aadbd78d3585c900c579c26f360011cf1ca830.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 10:13:33 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Ai Chao <aichao@...inos.cn>, perex <perex@...ex.cz>, tiwai
 <tiwai@...e.com>,  "kuninori.morimoto.gx"
 <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>, lgirdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
 broonie <broonie@...nel.org>, jbrunet	 <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
 "neil.armstrong" <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, khilman	
 <khilman@...libre.com>, "martin.blumenstingl"	
 <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>, "shengjiu.wang"
 <shengjiu.wang@...il.com>,  "Xiubo.Lee" <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>, festevam
 <festevam@...il.com>, nicoleotsuka <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,  shawnguo
 <shawnguo@...nel.org>, "s.hauer" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
 "srinivas.kandagatla"	 <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-sound <linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel	
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linuxppc-dev
 <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,  linux-renesas-soc
 <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,  linux-amlogic
 <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>, imx <imx@...ts.linux.dev>, kernel
 <kernel@...gutronix.de>,  linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] ASoC: aoa: Use helper function
 for_each_child_of_node_scoped()

On Mon, 2025-05-26 at 16:12 +0800, Ai Chao wrote:
> Hi Johannes:
> 
> > > "simplifies the code" is no need to callof_node_put() .
> > Fair. Except that's not what you _actually_ changed here. Like I said,
> > either it's buggy before or after.
> > 
> In the function i2sbus_probe, it not return a struct device_node, so , I 
> think function for_each_child_of_node_scoped is better than 
> for_each_child_of_node.

You still haven't explained why it's even correct.

johannes