[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b198ab8bcae5e9a31164bb565a089d14ff297b81.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 11:27:02 +0100
From: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>
To: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, lars@...afoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com,
dlechner@...libre.com, nuno.sa@...log.com, andy@...nel.org,
robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, brgl@...ev.pl, marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] iio: adc: ad4170: Add support for calibration
bias
On Tue, 2025-05-13 at 09:34 -0300, Marcelo Schmitt wrote:
> Add support for ADC calibration bias/offset configuration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>
> ---
> Change log v2 -> v3
> - New patch spun out of the base driver patch.
>
> drivers/iio/adc/ad4170.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad4170.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad4170.c
> index 1df214f7fdec..b02fdd25b4c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad4170.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad4170.c
> @@ -643,6 +643,7 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec ad4170_channel_template
> = {
> .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) |
> BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE) |
> BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET) |
> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBBIAS) |
> BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBSCALE),
> .info_mask_separate_available = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE),
> .scan_type = {
> @@ -954,6 +955,9 @@ static int ad4170_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> pga = FIELD_GET(AD4170_AFE_PGA_GAIN_MSK, setup->afe);
> *val = chan_info->offset_tbl[pga];
> return IIO_VAL_INT;
> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBBIAS:
> + *val = setup->offset;
same nit...
> + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBSCALE:
> *val = setup->gain;
> return IIO_VAL_INT;
> @@ -1083,6 +1087,25 @@ static int ad4170_set_pga(struct ad4170_state *st,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int ad4170_set_calib_offset(struct ad4170_state *st,
> + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, int val)
> +{
> + struct ad4170_chan_info *chan_info = &st->chan_infos[chan->address];
> + struct ad4170_setup *setup = &chan_info->setup;
> + u32 old_offset;
> + int ret;
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&st->lock);
> + old_offset = setup->offset;
> + setup->offset = val;
Why doing the above dance?
> +
> + ret = ad4170_write_channel_setup(st, chan->address, false);
> + if (ret)
> + setup->offset = old_offset;
> +
We could update the value in here.
> + return ret;
I guess ret > 0 is not a thing? I find it more readable:
return 0;
It makes it clear we got success :)
- Nuno Sá
> +}
> +
> static int ad4170_set_calib_gain(struct ad4170_state *st,
> struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, int val)
> {
> @@ -1111,6 +1134,8 @@ static int __ad4170_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> switch (info) {
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> return ad4170_set_pga(st, chan, val, val2);
> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBBIAS:
> + return ad4170_set_calib_offset(st, chan, val);
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBSCALE:
> return ad4170_set_calib_gain(st, chan, val);
> default:
> @@ -1139,6 +1164,7 @@ static int ad4170_write_raw_get_fmt(struct iio_dev
> *indio_dev,
> switch (info) {
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO;
> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBBIAS:
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBSCALE:
> return IIO_VAL_INT;
> default:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists