[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cb2d5cbd-d1e5-4a71-a24d-d02604c4016a@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 20:56:32 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
George Anthony Vernon <contact@...rnon.com>, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
skhan@...nel.org
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] input: docs: Fix Amiga joysticks grammar & formatting
On 5/26/25 19:48, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> writes:
>
>> On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 02:14:43AM +0100, George Anthony Vernon wrote:
>>> Make small grammar fixes to Amiga joystick documentation.
>>>
>>> Also make heading adornments compliant with the guidelines to improve
>>> organisation of the page.
>>
>> Split up these two changes into separate patches.
>
> The word "also" in a changelog is indeed a hint that a patch is doing
> too many things.
>
> For a simple patch like this, though, I would not force a resend just
> for that.
>
Do you mean keeping the patch as-is?
>>> -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> -Amiga joystick extensions
>>> -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> +===============
>>> +Amiga joysticks
>>> +===============
>>
>> I would prefer to keep section adornments in this doc as-is, though.
>
> ...and why...? We have a standard progression, why not use it?
>
I'm leaning towards following doc-specific convention (i.e. on this
doc). I could adapt to it, but some time later when I re-read the
source I might be semantically confused.
Thanks.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Powered by blists - more mailing lists