linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio-mem: fix multiple typos in struct comments and function docs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ad77ace7-89e6-4b26-bd11-9b7ce176dde9@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 21:12:20 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Alok Tiwari <alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com>, mst@...hat.com,
 jasowang@...hat.com, xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, eperezma@...hat.com,
 virtualization@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, darren.kenny@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio-mem: fix multiple typos in struct comments and
 function docs


>   /*
>    * Test if we could add memory without creating too much offline memory -
> - * to avoid running OOM if memory is getting onlined deferred.
> + * to avoid running OOM if memory is getting online deferred.

The system/user is onlining the memory, so the memory is getting "onlined"?

If it would be "getting online", wouldn't the memory start using the 
internet or sth. like that? :D

>    */
>   static bool virtio_mem_could_add_memory(struct virtio_mem *vm, uint64_t size)
>   {


-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb