linux-kernel - Re: [External] : Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio-mem: fix multiple typos in struct comments and function docs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <482052fb-1642-4853-9100-37510ec66452@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 00:52:21 +0530
From: ALOK TIWARI <alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
        xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, eperezma@...hat.com,
        virtualization@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, darren.kenny@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [External] : Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio-mem: fix multiple typos in
 struct comments and function docs



On 28-05-2025 00:42, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> 
>>   /*
>>    * Test if we could add memory without creating too much offline 
>> memory -
>> - * to avoid running OOM if memory is getting onlined deferred.
>> + * to avoid running OOM if memory is getting online deferred.
> 
> The system/user is onlining the memory, so the memory is getting "onlined"?
> 
> If it would be "getting online", wouldn't the memory start using the 
> internet or sth. like that? :D
> 
>>    */
>>   static bool virtio_mem_could_add_memory(struct virtio_mem *vm, 
>> uint64_t size)
>>   {
> 
> 

Thanks for the clarification—makes sense. I'll keep the original.

Thanks,
Alok