[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aDUBqusF_ROpiuNv@hyeyoo>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 09:04:58 +0900
From: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
To: Xianying Wang <wangxianying546@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] BUG: scheduling while atomic in throttle_direct_reclaim
On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 11:49:30PM +0800, Xianying Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I discovered a kernel crash described as "BUG: scheduling while atomic
> in throttle_direct_reclaim." This issue occurs in the memory reclaim
> path, specifically in the throttle_direct_reclaim function
> (mm/vmscan.c), where the kernel attempts to perform a potentially
> blocking operation (schedule_timeout) while still in an atomic or
> non-preemptible context, leading to an invalid scheduling state and
> triggering __schedule_bug().
>
> The crash trace shows that this condition can occur when the kernel
> mounts a specially crafted ISO9660 image via syz_mount_image$iso9660.
> During image parsing, the VFS initiates page readahead through
> read_pages, which issues block I/O backed by a loop device. This leads
> to a SCSI read path where scsi_alloc_sgtables
> (drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c) attempts to allocate memory for a
> scatterlist using mempool_alloc. If memory pressure is present,
> mempool_alloc triggers try_to_free_pages, and subsequently
> throttle_direct_reclaim.
>
> At this point, the kernel is likely in an atomic context due to
> earlier direct reclaim or preemption disabling within the block layer
> or SCSI stack. As a result, schedule_timeout is not allowed and
> triggers a BUG.
>
> I recommend reviewing the reclaim context propagation in:
>
> scsi_alloc_sgtables and sg_alloc_table_chained
> mempool_alloc in SCSI I/O paths
> throttle_direct_reclaim to ensure blocking calls are not made from
> atomic contexts
>
> This can be reproduced on:
>
> HEAD commit:
>
> commit e8f897f4afef0031fe618a8e94127a0934896aba
Well, that's Linux v6.8, which is already end of life.
Please DO NOT REPORT bugs from kernels that are past their EOL.
I spent an hour only to realize this had already been fixed.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240614143238.60323-1-andrey.konovalov@linux.dev/T/#u
This is KASAN passing incorrect gfp flag to stackdepot, triggering
memory reclamation while mempool is holding a spinlock.
> report: https://pastebin.com/raw/bxuLHCgu
>
> console output : https://pastebin.com/raw/mCZ4Ap8Q
>
> kernel config : https://pastebin.com/raw/aJ9rUnhG
>
> C reproducer : https://pastebin.com/raw/1dku01DG
>
> Best regards,
>
> Xianying
--
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists