[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72nhr24L-yKU8rFjCRTeY1yJ2FGNYP2RfmO=_+XgLgHFTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 02:08:51 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] rust: kunit: support KUnit-mapped `assert!` macros in `#[test]`s
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 8:02 AM David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Nice! While I do think there may still be some cases where we might
> want to use KUnit-specific macros in the future (particularly if we
> have more complex, multithreaded test contexts), this is definitely
> better for most cases.
>
> I also managed to test it against the 1.88 nightly, and the message is
> looking good.
>
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Thanks for all the feedback and for testing it, David! Very much appreciated.
Given you were happy with this first version already and that others
want to use it soon, I did a few final minor tweaks and I am applying
it.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists