[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aDWb4ZlBgr_oSaGH@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 13:02:57 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: alejandroe1@...tab.com, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: gnss: add u-blox,neo-9m compatible
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 12:51:12PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 27/05/2025 12:44, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 10:35:14AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 23/05/2025 13:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> On 23/05/2025 13:19, Alejandro Enrique via B4 Relay wrote:
> >>>> From: Alejandro Enrique <alejandroe1@...tab.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Add compatible for u-blox NEO-9M GPS module.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Enrique <alejandroe1@...tab.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> This series just add the compatible string for u-blox NEO-9M module,
> >>>> using neo-m8 as fallback. I have tested the driver with such a module
> >>>> and it is working fine.
> >>>> ---
> >>>
> >>> I assume there is a user somewhere?
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> >> Un-reviewed. Please drop the patch. It turns out there is no user for
> >> this binding. We don't take bindings for every possible device out there
> >> - you need users of that binding.
> >
> > No, we don't require manufacturers to upstream their machine dts.
>
> No, we don't take bindings for whatever is there. In any case, drop my
> review tag.
Perhaps not for whatever, but here we have an actual user that needs
this binding do I'll take it.
And I'll try to remember to drop your tag.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists