linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: gnss: add u-blox,neo-9m compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0225b57c-1240-4382-a15a-6fa16abdec14@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 13:14:54 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: alejandroe1@...tab.com, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: gnss: add u-blox,neo-9m compatible

On 27/05/2025 13:02, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 12:51:12PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 27/05/2025 12:44, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 10:35:14AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 23/05/2025 13:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 23/05/2025 13:19, Alejandro Enrique via B4 Relay wrote:
>>>>>> From: Alejandro Enrique <alejandroe1@...tab.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Add compatible for u-blox NEO-9M GPS module.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Enrique <alejandroe1@...tab.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> This series just add the compatible string for u-blox NEO-9M module,
>>>>>> using neo-m8 as fallback. I have tested the driver with such a module
>>>>>> and it is working fine.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> I assume there is a user somewhere?
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>>> Un-reviewed. Please drop the patch. It turns out there is no user for
>>>> this binding. We don't take bindings for every possible device out there
>>>> - you need users of that binding.
>>>
>>> No, we don't require manufacturers to upstream their machine dts.
>>
>> No, we don't take bindings for whatever is there. In any case, drop my
>> review tag.
> 
> Perhaps not for whatever, but here we have an actual user that needs
> this binding do I'll take it.

Great, I understand above that I can send you bindings for multiple
devices I have (or had and still have interest in or my previous
employer has interest in), which are used in downstream products, and
you will take these bindings?

That would be cool, because I have bunch of GNSS devices related to my
pre-previous job, which I would really like to upstream.

Is my understanding correct?

Best regards,
Krzysztof