[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<DS7PR19MB88834D9D5ADB9351E40EBE5A9D64A@DS7PR19MB8883.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 15:28:13 +0400
From: George Moussalem <george.moussalem@...look.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: net: qca,ar803x: Add IPQ5018 Internal GE
PHY support
Hi Konrad,
On 5/27/25 14:59, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 5/26/25 2:55 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 26/05/2025 08:43, George Moussalem wrote:
>>>>> + qca,dac:
>>>>> + description:
>>>>> + Values for MDAC and EDAC to adjust amplitude, bias current settings,
>>>>> + and error detection and correction algorithm. Only set in a PHY to PHY
>>>>> + link architecture to accommodate for short cable length.
>>>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
>>>>> + items:
>>>>> + - items:
>>>>> + - description: value for MDAC. Expected 0x10, if set
>>>>> + - description: value for EDAC. Expected 0x10, if set
>>>>
>>>> If this is fixed to 0x10, then this is fully deducible from compatible.
>>>> Drop entire property.
>>>
>>> as mentioned to Andrew, I can move the required values to the driver
>>> itself, but a property would still be required to indicate that this PHY
>>> is connected to an external PHY (ex. qca8337 switch). In that case, the
>>> values need to be set. Otherwise, not..
>>>
>>> Would qcom,phy-to-phy-dac (boolean) do?
>>
>> Seems fine to me.
>
> Can the driver instead check for a phy reference?
Do you mean using the existing phy-handle DT property or create a new DT
property called 'qcom,phy-reference'? Either way, can add it for v2.
>
> Konrad
Best regards,
George
Powered by blists - more mailing lists