[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aDWoCU2YrxaCBi42@example.org>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 13:54:49 +0200
From: Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Cc: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, Khalid Aziz <khalid@...ehiking.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] scsi: Define MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE only if necessary
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 07:28:59AM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-05-27 at 11:07 +0200, Alexey Gladkov wrote:
> > Define MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE only if a structure is defined for it.
> >
> > drivers/scsi/BusLogic.c:3735:26: error: use of undeclared identifier
> > 'blogic_pci_tbl'
> > 3735 | MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, blogic_pci_tbl);
>
> Well, a) need to cc the scsi list
Sorry. I miss it.
> and b) how is this possible when
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() has an empty definition if MODULE isn't defined
> (so the guard you move should be over an empty statement)?
In the next patch:
[PATCH v3 4/6] modpost: Create modalias for builtin modules
I remove this condition for the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE macro and it will be
always defined.
I put the drivers/scsi/BusLogic.c change before these changes to avoid
errors. Besides, even an empty macro uses a structure name that is not
defined (if MODULE isn't defined). This seems wrong in any case.
--
Rgrds, legion
Powered by blists - more mailing lists