linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] sched: Try and address some recent-ish regressions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250528195944.GB19261@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 21:59:44 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
	mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com, clm@...a.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] sched: Try and address some recent-ish
 regressions

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:45:38AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> Anyway, the patches are stable (finally!, I hope, knock on wood) but in a
> somewhat rough state. At the very least the last patch is missing ttwu_stat(),
> still need to figure out how to account it ;-)
> 
> Chris, I'm hoping your machine will agree with these numbers; it hasn't been
> straight sailing in that regard.

Anybody? -- If no comments I'll just stick them in sched/core or so.