linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] sched: Try and address some recent-ish regressions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8a65afe3-30ba-45ed-9862-361376873ee0@meta.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 21:41:33 -0400
From: Chris Mason <clm@...a.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
        juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
        mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] sched: Try and address some recent-ish
 regressions

On 5/28/25 3:59 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:45:38AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
>> Anyway, the patches are stable (finally!, I hope, knock on wood) but in a
>> somewhat rough state. At the very least the last patch is missing ttwu_stat(),
>> still need to figure out how to account it ;-)
>>
>> Chris, I'm hoping your machine will agree with these numbers; it hasn't been
>> straight sailing in that regard.
> 
> Anybody? -- If no comments I'll just stick them in sched/core or so.

Hi Peter,

I'll get all of these run on the big turin machine, should have some
numbers tomorrow.

-chris