lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0e2801dbcef4$78fe5ec0$6afb1c40$@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 16:15:29 +0530
From: "Shradha Todi" <shradha.t@...sung.com>
To: "'Krzysztof Kozlowski'" <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.or>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>, <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, <kw@...ux.com>,
	<robh@...nel.org>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
	<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
	<vkoul@...nel.org>, <kishon@...nel.org>, <arnd@...db.de>,
	<m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 09/10] PCI: exynos: Add support for Tesla FSD SoC



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> Sent: 21 May 2025 15:18
> To: Shradha Todi <shradha.t@...sung.com>
> Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.or;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org; manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org; lpieralisi@...nel.org;
> kw@...ux.com; robh@...nel.org; bhelgaas@...gle.com; jingoohan1@...il.com; krzk+dt@...nel.org; conor+dt@...nel.org;
> alim.akhtar@...sung.com; vkoul@...nel.org; kishon@...nel.org; arnd@...db.de; m.szyprowski@...sung.com;
> jh80.chung@...sung.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] PCI: exynos: Add support for Tesla FSD SoC
> 
> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 01:01:51AM GMT, Shradha Todi wrote:
> >  static int exynos_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)  {
> >  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > @@ -355,6 +578,26 @@ static int exynos_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	if (IS_ERR(ep->phy))
> >  		return PTR_ERR(ep->phy);
> >
> > +	if (ep->pdata->soc_variant == FSD) {
> > +		ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(36));
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			return ret;
> > +
> > +		ep->sysreg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node,
> > +				"samsung,syscon-pcie");
> > +		if (IS_ERR(ep->sysreg)) {
> > +			dev_err(dev, "sysreg regmap lookup failed.\n");
> > +			return PTR_ERR(ep->sysreg);
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		ret = of_property_read_u32_index(dev->of_node, "samsung,syscon-pcie", 1,
> > +						 &ep->sysreg_offset);
> > +		if (ret) {
> > +			dev_err(dev, "couldn't get the register offset for syscon!\n");
> 
> So all MMIO will go via syscon? I am pretty close to NAKing all this, but let's be sure that I got it right - please post your complete DTS
> for upstream. That's a requirement from me for any samsung drivers - I don't want to support fake, broken downstream solutions
> (based on multiple past submissions).
> 

By all MMIO do you mean DBI read/write? The FSD hardware architecture is such that the DBI/ATU/DMA address is at the same offset.
The syscon register holds the upper bits of the actual address differentiating between these 3 spaces. This kind of implementation was done
to reduce address space for PCI DWC controller. So yes, each DBI/ATU register read/write will have syscon write before it to switch address space.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ