linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs changes for 6.16

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c2001c69-e735-4976-ac8b-6269c825cb92@tnxip.de>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 11:33:34 +0200
From: Malte Schröder <malte.schroeder@...ip.de>
To: Christopher Snowhill <chris@...e54.net>, John Stoffel <john@...ffel.org>,
 Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
 linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs changes for 6.16

On 28/05/2025 11:00, Christopher Snowhill wrote:
> On Tue May 27, 2025 at 11:52 AM PDT, John Stoffel wrote:
>>>>>>> "Kent" == Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev> writes:
>>> There was a feature request I forgot to mention - New option,
>>> 'rebalance_on_ac_only'. Does exactly what the name suggests, quite
>>> handy with background compression.
>> LOL, only if you know what the _ac_ part stands for.  :-)
> Would you have suggested perhaps _mains_ ? That may have rang better
> with some folks. I suppose, at least.
>
What about 'no_rebalance_on_battery'? 

/Malte