[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aDbYs7QZRfr2i80A@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 12:34:43 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>,
Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@...el.com>,
Imre Deak <imre.deak@...el.com>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Michael J. Ruhl" <michael.j.ruhl@...el.com>,
intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/vsec: fix CONFIG_INTEL_VSEC dependency
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 03:55:46PM -0500, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 02:10:46PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
...
> > + depends on INTEL_PLATFORM_DEVICES || !(X86 && ACPI)
>
> ^
> Did you mean X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES here?
Why do we need to depend on the whole thingy (yes, it will be enabled at the
end) if we only talking about Intel?
> With that, Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>
>
> I see several drivers selecting
> X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES though. Maybe they should also be translated to
> dependencies instead?
I think so, selecting that sounds wrong.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists