[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7aff9a7076ada15146d4fe60d2c6cd9d99370385@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 12:35:27 +0300
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>
Cc: dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, LKML
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm for 6.16-rc1
On Wed, 28 May 2025, Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com> wrote:
> The disgusting turds removal patchset is also in here.
I don't think it is. At least I didn't merge it. The existing thing just
still depends on BROKEN.
I had a few attempts at fixing it, Linus was okay with the patches,
Masahiro was not, and that was that. I don't think it's possible to meet
Linus' requirements of genericity without touching kbuild makefiles, and
Masahiro apparently doesn't want it in kbuild.
I still think what we want to do is reasonable. I'm not looking to
impose any header checks on anyone outside of drm, and not even on all
of drm. But I can't hide it inside drm makefiles. I don't know where to
go from here.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists