[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250528151715.59b8f738@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 15:17:15 +0200
From: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet
<corbet@....net>, Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Simon Horman
<horms@...nel.org>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor
Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark
Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Kyle Swenson <kyle.swenson@....tech>, Dent
Project <dentproject@...uxfoundation.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de, Maxime
Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v12 00/13] Add support for PSE budget
evaluation strategy
Le Wed, 28 May 2025 09:31:20 +0200,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> a écrit :
> On 5/24/25 12:56 PM, Kory Maincent wrote:
> > From: Kory Maincent (Dent Project) <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
> >
> > This series brings support for budget evaluation strategy in the PSE
> > subsystem. PSE controllers can set priorities to decide which ports should
> > be turned off in case of special events like over-current.
> >
> > This patch series adds support for two budget evaluation strategy.
> > 1. Static Method:
> >
> > This method involves distributing power based on PD classification.
> > It’s straightforward and stable, the PSE core keeping track of the
> > budget and subtracting the power requested by each PD’s class.
> >
> > Advantages: Every PD gets its promised power at any time, which
> > guarantees reliability.
> >
> > Disadvantages: PD classification steps are large, meaning devices
> > request much more power than they actually need. As a result, the power
> > supply may only operate at, say, 50% capacity, which is inefficient and
> > wastes money.
> >
> > 2. Dynamic Method:
> >
> > To address the inefficiencies of the static method, vendors like
> > Microchip have introduced dynamic power budgeting, as seen in the
> > PD692x0 firmware. This method monitors the current consumption per port
> > and subtracts it from the available power budget. When the budget is
> > exceeded, lower-priority ports are shut down.
> >
> > Advantages: This method optimizes resource utilization, saving costs.
> >
> > Disadvantages: Low-priority devices may experience instability.
> >
> > The UAPI allows adding support for software port priority mode managed from
> > userspace later if needed.
> >
> > Patches 1-2: Add support for interrupt event report in PSE core, ethtool
> > and ethtool specs.
> > Patch 3: Adds support for interrupt and event report in TPS23881 driver.
> > Patches 4,5: Add support for PSE power domain in PSE core and ethtool.
> > Patches 6-8: Add support for budget evaluation strategy in PSE core,
> > ethtool and ethtool specs.
> > Patches 9-11: Add support for port priority and power supplies in PD692x0
> > drivers.
> > Patches 12,13: Add support for port priority in TPS23881 drivers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kory Maincent (Dent Project) <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
>
> I'm sorry, even if this has been posted (just) before the merge window,
> I think an uAPI extension this late is a bit too dangerous, please
> repost when net-next will reopen after the merge window.
Ok I will.
Would it be possible to review the netlink part of the series? (patch 2, 7 and
8)
Regard,
--
Köry Maincent, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists