[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b3cdc35-8bcc-41f6-84ec-aee50638b929@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 09:31:20 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Kyle Swenson <kyle.swenson@....tech>,
Dent Project <dentproject@...uxfoundation.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v12 00/13] Add support for PSE budget evaluation
strategy
On 5/24/25 12:56 PM, Kory Maincent wrote:
> From: Kory Maincent (Dent Project) <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
>
> This series brings support for budget evaluation strategy in the PSE
> subsystem. PSE controllers can set priorities to decide which ports should
> be turned off in case of special events like over-current.
>
> This patch series adds support for two budget evaluation strategy.
> 1. Static Method:
>
> This method involves distributing power based on PD classification.
> It’s straightforward and stable, the PSE core keeping track of the
> budget and subtracting the power requested by each PD’s class.
>
> Advantages: Every PD gets its promised power at any time, which
> guarantees reliability.
>
> Disadvantages: PD classification steps are large, meaning devices
> request much more power than they actually need. As a result, the power
> supply may only operate at, say, 50% capacity, which is inefficient and
> wastes money.
>
> 2. Dynamic Method:
>
> To address the inefficiencies of the static method, vendors like
> Microchip have introduced dynamic power budgeting, as seen in the
> PD692x0 firmware. This method monitors the current consumption per port
> and subtracts it from the available power budget. When the budget is
> exceeded, lower-priority ports are shut down.
>
> Advantages: This method optimizes resource utilization, saving costs.
>
> Disadvantages: Low-priority devices may experience instability.
>
> The UAPI allows adding support for software port priority mode managed from
> userspace later if needed.
>
> Patches 1-2: Add support for interrupt event report in PSE core, ethtool
> and ethtool specs.
> Patch 3: Adds support for interrupt and event report in TPS23881 driver.
> Patches 4,5: Add support for PSE power domain in PSE core and ethtool.
> Patches 6-8: Add support for budget evaluation strategy in PSE core,
> ethtool and ethtool specs.
> Patches 9-11: Add support for port priority and power supplies in PD692x0
> drivers.
> Patches 12,13: Add support for port priority in TPS23881 drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kory Maincent (Dent Project) <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
I'm sorry, even if this has been posted (just) before the merge window,
I think an uAPI extension this late is a bit too dangerous, please
repost when net-next will reopen after the merge window.
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists