[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aDrWCBAxPnu7VY0P@pollux>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2025 12:12:24 +0200
From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
To: Igor Korotin <igor.korotin.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: acpi: add `acpi::DeviceId` abstraction
On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 07:49:46AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 05:11:29PM +0100, Igor Korotin wrote:
> > On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 3:43 PM Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 01:38:06PM +0100, Igor Korotin wrote:
> > > > `acpi::DeviceId` is an abstraction around `struct acpi_device_id`.
> > > >
> > > > This is used by subsequent patches, in particular the i2c driver
> > > > abstractions, to create ACPI device ID tables.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Igor Korotin <igor.korotin.linux@...il.com>
> > >
> > > As Greg mentioned it would be nice to see the subsequent patches.
> >
> > Ok. There's a little misunderstanding from my side. I'm in the
> > progress of implementation
> > of I2C driver abstractions. I2C drivers can use either "of" or "acpi".
> > The idea was to push this
> > change first, because:
> > - It's quite standalone one.
> > - I'm not sure how much time it will take me to finalize I2C drivers
> > abstractions.
>
> If you don't need it now, then there's no rush to get it merged now :)
>
> > If it is not appropriate way of commits, I'll then keep it until all is done.
>
> We would like to see it be used first, to ensure that the code is
> actually correct.
Alternatively, if you want to upstream this dependency already you can send the
following patches:
- this acpi::DeviceId abstraction
- the glue code for the generic adapter trait in rust/kernel/driver.rs
- use this glue code in the platform abstraction
- add acpi support to the platform sample driver
This way we can already validate that the code works correctly. All this is
required anyways if the I2C device you write a driver for is on the platform
bus.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists