lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3548813.44csPzL39Z@fw-rgant>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2025 18:17:24 +0200
From: Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
 Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>,
 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
 Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>, Jai Luthra <jai.luthra@...asonboard.com>,
 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
 Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
 Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with the i2c tree

Hi Wolfram,

On Friday, 30 May 2025 13:24:46 CEST Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Below is the resolution I came up with.
> 
> Thank you for this...
> 
> > -       for (reg_idx = 0; reg_idx < ARRAY_SIZE(rxport->aliased_clients);
> > reg_idx++) {
> 
> ... but it was mangled, sadly. Can you resend it properly, please?

Sorry about that, here's a hopefully properly formatted version. Besides the 
issue that Linus found with the mutex_destroy(), I'd also missed a 
"s/client->addr/addr" in the previous version.

By the way, this is just the output of "git show" after resolving the merge, 
I'm not used to sending these "resolutions diffs" so please let me know
if you need it in some other form.

Thanks,

---

diff --cc drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
index ed9ace1a54766,94b20ba6cb86f..082fc62b0f5b9
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
@@@ -1271,10 -1056,11 +1274,12 @@@ static int ub960_atr_attach_addr(struc
  	struct ub960_rxport *rxport = priv->rxports[chan_id];
  	struct device *dev = &priv->client->dev;
  	unsigned int reg_idx;
 +	int ret = 0;
  
- 	for (reg_idx = 0; reg_idx < ARRAY_SIZE(rxport->aliased_clients); reg_idx++) {
- 		if (!rxport->aliased_clients[reg_idx])
+ 	guard(mutex)(&rxport->aliased_addrs_lock);
+ 
+ 	for (reg_idx = 0; reg_idx < ARRAY_SIZE(rxport->aliased_addrs); reg_idx++) {
+ 		if (!rxport->aliased_addrs[reg_idx])
  			break;
  	}
  
@@@ -1283,18 -1069,15 +1288,18 @@@
  		return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
  	}
  
- 	rxport->aliased_clients[reg_idx] = client;
+ 	rxport->aliased_addrs[reg_idx] = addr;
  
  	ub960_rxport_write(priv, chan_id, UB960_RR_SLAVE_ID(reg_idx),
- 			   client->addr << 1, &ret);
 -			   addr << 1);
++			   addr << 1, &ret);
  	ub960_rxport_write(priv, chan_id, UB960_RR_SLAVE_ALIAS(reg_idx),
 -			   alias << 1);
 +			   alias << 1, &ret);
 +
 +	if (ret)
 +		return ret;
  
  	dev_dbg(dev, "rx%u: client 0x%02x assigned alias 0x%02x at slot %u\n",
- 		rxport->nport, client->addr, alias, reg_idx);
+ 		rxport->nport, addr, alias, reg_idx);
  
  	return 0;
  }
@@@ -1306,10 -1089,11 +1311,12 @@@ static void ub960_atr_detach_addr(struc
  	struct ub960_rxport *rxport = priv->rxports[chan_id];
  	struct device *dev = &priv->client->dev;
  	unsigned int reg_idx;
 +	int ret;
  
- 	for (reg_idx = 0; reg_idx < ARRAY_SIZE(rxport->aliased_clients); reg_idx++) {
- 		if (rxport->aliased_clients[reg_idx] == client)
+ 	guard(mutex)(&rxport->aliased_addrs_lock);
+ 
+ 	for (reg_idx = 0; reg_idx < ARRAY_SIZE(rxport->aliased_addrs); reg_idx++) {
+ 		if (rxport->aliased_addrs[reg_idx] == addr)
  			break;
  	}
  
@@@ -1319,18 -1103,12 +1326,18 @@@
  		return;
  	}
  
- 	rxport->aliased_clients[reg_idx] = NULL;
+ 	rxport->aliased_addrs[reg_idx] = 0;
  
 -	ub960_rxport_write(priv, chan_id, UB960_RR_SLAVE_ALIAS(reg_idx), 0);
 +	ret = ub960_rxport_write(priv, chan_id, UB960_RR_SLAVE_ALIAS(reg_idx),
 +				 0, NULL);
 +	if (ret) {
 +		dev_err(dev, "rx%u: unable to fully unmap client 0x%02x: %d\n",
- 			rxport->nport, client->addr, ret);
++			rxport->nport, addr, ret);
 +		return;
 +	}
  
  	dev_dbg(dev, "rx%u: client 0x%02x released at slot %u\n", rxport->nport,
- 		client->addr, reg_idx);
+ 		addr, reg_idx);
  }
  
  static const struct i2c_atr_ops ub960_atr_ops = {
@@@ -4370,12 -3231,21 +4376,14 @@@ static void ub960_txport_free_ports(str
  
  static void ub960_rxport_free_ports(struct ub960_data *priv)
  {
 -	unsigned int nport;
 -
 -	for (nport = 0; nport < priv->hw_data->num_rxports; nport++) {
 -		struct ub960_rxport *rxport = priv->rxports[nport];
 -
 -		if (!rxport)
 -			continue;
 -
 -		fwnode_handle_put(rxport->source.ep_fwnode);
 -		fwnode_handle_put(rxport->ser.fwnode);
 +	for_each_active_rxport(priv, it) {
 +		fwnode_handle_put(it.rxport->source.ep_fwnode);
 +		fwnode_handle_put(it.rxport->ser.fwnode);
  
 -		mutex_destroy(&rxport->aliased_addrs_lock);
++		mutex_destroy(&it.rxport->aliased_addrs_lock);
+ 
 -		kfree(rxport);
 -		priv->rxports[nport] = NULL;
 +		kfree(it.rxport);
 +		priv->rxports[it.nport] = NULL;
  	}
  }
  





Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ