[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5203152.31r3eYUQgx@fw-rgant>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2025 17:57:08 +0200
From: Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
 Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>,
 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
 Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>, Jai Luthra <jai.luthra@...asonboard.com>,
 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
 Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
 Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with the i2c tree
Hi Wolfram,
On Saturday, 31 May 2025 14:05:03 CEST Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Below is the resolution I came up with.
> 
> Linus solved it differently [1]. I think he is right, but those
> interested please double check.
> 
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wiKW=BPcDvBAsVDemdWBR0uh09A_WMOCoceqj3w3d
> oGJg@...l.gmail.com/
Indeed Linus' resolution is correct, the mutex destroy line should be:
    mutex_destroy(&it.rxport->aliased_addrs_lock);
Thanks,
-- 
Romain Gantois, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
