[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025060302-reflected-tarot-acfc@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 12:06:34 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/270] 5.10.238-rc1 review
On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 10:45:34AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 03:44:45PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.238 release.
> > There are 270 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
>
> This fails to boot with a NFS root on Raspberry Pi 3b+, due to
> 558a48d4fabd70213117ec20f476adff48f72365 ("net: phy: microchip: force
> IRQ polling mode for lan88xx") as was also a problem for other stables.
Odd, I see it in the 5.15.y released tree, so did we get a fix for it
with a different commit or should it just be dropped entirely from the
5.10.y queue?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists