[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250603094329.125537-1-diogo.ivo@siemens.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 10:43:29 +0100
From: Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@...mens.com>
To: andy.shevchenko@...il.com
Cc: benedikt.niedermayr@...mens.com,
diogo.ivo@...mens.com,
jan.kiszka@...mens.com,
lenb@...nel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
linux@...ck-us.net,
mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com,
rafael@...nel.org,
wim@...ux-watchdog.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Add driver for Intel Over-Clocking Watchdog
Hi Andy,
> This doesn't describe why we need the driver. We have established ACPI WDAT
> table. Can't you utilise it by providing in the firmware?
You are right, I did not make that clear.
When you say we have established WDAT table do you mean that this should be the
mechanism that we use going forward to control watchdogs in ACPI platforms
generally or that you know that the WDAT for this specific watchdog is present
in the firmware?
I wrote the driver because on the two platforms I have access to (a fairly
recent LG Gram with an i7 1260p and a Siemens BX51A) by delving into the
BIOS options I was not able to find a toggle for them to provide a WDAT table
for this watchdog. In fact, on the LG Gram by searching we can get it to pass
us a WDAT table but for the iTCO watchdog (at least that is what I gathered
from my testing).
This means that to the best of my knowledge there are platforms that do not
provide a WDAT table for the Over-Clocking Watchdog which then makes this
driver necessary.
However I am not an expert on this topic so if there are things that I am
missing I would be happy to work on a better approach.
Thanks,
Diogo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists