[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7fe6fd7f-75aa-47a8-bf90-1c0680a3334a@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 13:45:25 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Mathieu Dubois-Briand <mathieu.dubois-briand@...tlin.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Kamel Bouhara <kamel.bouhara@...tlin.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>,
Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
andriy.shevchenko@...el.com,
Grégory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 05/11] regmap: irq: Add support for chips without
separate IRQ status
On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 10:01:55AM +0200, Mathieu Dubois-Briand wrote:
> So my understanding is I should have rebased on linux-next master branch
> instead, right?
You should at the very least have identified that it was being resent
and wasn't changed from what was applied. To be honest it'd probably
have been as well to wait until after the merge window given the minimal
prospects of anything being applied so late anyway.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists