[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63fed4b9-1c04-49ac-b4c9-f1e5359d8550@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 09:38:35 -0400
From: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>, Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] sched: Add support to pick functions to take rf
On 6/2/2025 8:05 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 02:00:57PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> Some pick functions like the internal pick_next_task_fair() already take
>> rf but some others dont. We need this for scx's server pick function.
>> Prepare for this by having pick functions accept it.
>
> Hmm.. after the whole patch series is applied, pick_task_scx() still doesn't
> seem to use @rf. What am I missing?
I need it for scx *server*'s pick_task, i.e. ext_server_pick_task().
Sure we're not using it in pick_task_scx(), but I added it there for consistency
since pick_task_dl() needs it, due to ext_server_pick_task() needing it.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists