linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] PM: sleep: Suspend async parents after suspending children

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gy1Fi6QYw1XYwfszZN=x5O=gWDnassPfsh5RY5_Ap-fg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 15:59:25 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@...il.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Mario Limonciello <superm1@...nel.org>, 
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, 
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, 
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, 
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, 
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] PM: sleep: Suspend async parents after suspending children

On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 3:36 PM Chris Bainbridge
<chris.bainbridge@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 03:04:33PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 2:27 PM Chris Bainbridge
> > <chris.bainbridge@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 at 13:24, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch does fix the list corruption, but the "Unbalanced
> > > > > pm_runtime_enable" still occurs:
> > > >
> > > > Have you applied it together with the previous patch?
> > >
> > > Yes
> >
> > So it looks like some devices have power.is_suspended set from the
> > previous cycle which causes device_resume() to attempt to resume them
> > even though they have not been suspended in the current cycle yet.
> >
> > Please try the attached patch in addition to the previous 2 patches.
> >
> > Thanks!
>
> That fixed it. Passed 30 attempted suspends without error.
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@...il.com>

Thanks for verifying!

I will add changelogs to the patches and send them later today.