[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5876fb5f-dc8c-401a-833a-a33265ff1fc1@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 16:23:59 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: "samitolvanen@...gle.com" <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/virt/tdx: Add ENDBR for low level SEAMCALL assembly
functions
On 6/4/25 16:16, Huang, Kai wrote:
> Could you also let me know whether I should keep the Fixes tag, and the
> history in the changelog?
Yeah, I think you should keep the Fixes: tag, unless I'm missing something.
As for the history lesson, you can just say that you think that the TDX
code was OK when merged, but wasn't converted with the rest of the
Fixes: commit. That's all you need.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists