[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5ebc8a6497b7dd7029fd45e7516228e65eceb6ab.camel@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 23:27:50 +0000
From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
To: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "peterz@...radead.org"
<peterz@...radead.org>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "Hansen, Dave"
<dave.hansen@...el.com>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"samitolvanen@...gle.com" <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, "Edgecombe, Rick P"
<rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/virt/tdx: Add ENDBR for low level SEAMCALL assembly
functions
On Wed, 2025-06-04 at 16:23 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 6/4/25 16:16, Huang, Kai wrote:
> > Could you also let me know whether I should keep the Fixes tag, and the
> > history in the changelog?
>
> Yeah, I think you should keep the Fixes: tag, unless I'm missing something.
>
> As for the history lesson, you can just say that you think that the TDX
> code was OK when merged, but wasn't converted with the rest of the
> Fixes: commit. That's all you need.
Will do. Thanks for quick feedback.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists