[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250604232550.40491-3-yury.norov@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 19:25:48 -0400
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: "Yury Norov [NVIDIA]" <yury.norov@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] clocksource: fix opencoded cpumask_next_wrap()
From: Yury Norov [NVIDIA] <yury.norov@...il.com>
cpumask_next_wrap() is more verbose and efficient comparing to
cpumask_next() followed by cpumask_first().
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov [NVIDIA] <yury.norov@...il.com>
---
kernel/time/clocksource.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
index 2e24ce884272..0aef0e349e49 100644
--- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c
+++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
@@ -584,9 +584,7 @@ static void clocksource_watchdog(struct timer_list *unused)
* Cycle through CPUs to check if the CPUs stay synchronized
* to each other.
*/
- next_cpu = cpumask_next(raw_smp_processor_id(), cpu_online_mask);
- if (next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
- next_cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
+ next_cpu = cpumask_next_wrap(raw_smp_processor_id(), cpu_online_mask);
/*
* Arm timer if not already pending: could race with concurrent
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists