lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ab813159-14e1-434f-8055-80486f5d6b3f@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 11:07:08 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Martijn de Gouw <martijn.de.gouw@...drive-technologies.com>,
 Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: regulator: add pca9450: Add
 regulator-allowed-modes

On 04/06/2025 10:58, Martijn de Gouw wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/4/2025 10:27 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 04/06/2025 09:04, Martijn de Gouw wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 5/25/2025 9:18 AM, Martijn de Gouw wrote:
>>>> Make the PWM mode on the buck controllers configurable from devicetree.
>>>> Some boards require forced PWM mode to keep the supply ripple within
>>>> acceptable limits under light load conditions.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Martijn de Gouw <martijn.de.gouw@...drive-technologies.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>>   - Fix typo in the examples
>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>>   - Add the header to the binding patch
>>>>   - Improve commit message
>>>>
>>>>  .../regulator/nxp,pca9450-regulator.yaml       | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>>>  .../regulator/nxp,pca9450-regulator.h          | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> Does this patch need additional changes?
>>
>> What is wrong with the email you already received? What do you exactly
>> need from us?
> 
> V2 was merged rather quickly, on V3 there was only the Acked-by: Conor Dooley. So it's safe to assume V3 is now waiting to be merged?

So this was ping for merging of entire patchset, not that patch? There
is little point in pinging frequent and during the merge window -
usually nothing can happen now.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ