lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4d3f3552-de42-430a-afaf-b852784817ee@prodrive-technologies.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 11:10:57 +0200
From: Martijn de Gouw <martijn.de.gouw@...drive-technologies.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Liam Girdwood
 <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: regulator: add pca9450: Add
 regulator-allowed-modes



On 6/4/2025 11:07 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/06/2025 10:58, Martijn de Gouw wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/4/2025 10:27 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 04/06/2025 09:04, Martijn de Gouw wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 5/25/2025 9:18 AM, Martijn de Gouw wrote:
>>>>> Make the PWM mode on the buck controllers configurable from devicetree.
>>>>> Some boards require forced PWM mode to keep the supply ripple within
>>>>> acceptable limits under light load conditions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Martijn de Gouw <martijn.de.gouw@...drive-technologies.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>>>   - Fix typo in the examples
>>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>>>   - Add the header to the binding patch
>>>>>   - Improve commit message
>>>>>
>>>>>  .../regulator/nxp,pca9450-regulator.yaml       | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>>>>  .../regulator/nxp,pca9450-regulator.h          | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> Does this patch need additional changes?
>>>
>>> What is wrong with the email you already received? What do you exactly
>>> need from us?
>>
>> V2 was merged rather quickly, on V3 there was only the Acked-by: Conor Dooley. So it's safe to assume V3 is now waiting to be merged?
> 
> So this was ping for merging of entire patchset, not that patch? There
> is little point in pinging frequent and during the merge window -
> usually nothing can happen now.

Clear, thanks!

Regards, Martijn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ