[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOuDEK1471toXVEiNySQtmrRTSPwzo840Q2d5pw9M4fCOfsgTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 20:32:00 +0800
From: Guan-Yu Lin <guanyulin@...gle.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: mathias.nyman@...el.com, gargaditya08@...e.com, kekrby@...il.com,
jeff.johnson@....qualcomm.com, quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, ben@...adent.org.uk, broonie@...nel.org,
quic_wcheng@...cinc.com, krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org,
sumit.garg@...nel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 0/4] Support system sleep with offloaded usb transfers
On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 6:56 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 08:23:06AM +0000, Guan-Yu Lin wrote:
>
> Is there a reason you aren't cc:ing the developers from a "big android
> device company" that is currently testing and finding problems with this
> patchset in their device testing? I will require their signed-off-by or
> tested-by in order to even consider accepting this patch series based on
> the issues they seem to be finding with it in an
> internal-company-bug-reporting-platform that I seem to be also copied
> on.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
I'm not sure if the company wants to reveal its testing right now
since the company raised the problem with the internal system. Hence,
we still use the internal system to communicate with them. We
understand that "signed-off-by"/"tested-by" tags are required to merge
the code, so we'll keep working closely with multiple companies to
achieve this.
Regards,
Guan-Yu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists