linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v14 0/4] Support system sleep with offloaded usb transfers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025061957-daylong-legal-fed1@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 11:27:07 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guan-Yu Lin <guanyulin@...gle.com>
Cc: mathias.nyman@...el.com, gargaditya08@...e.com, kekrby@...il.com,
	jeff.johnson@....qualcomm.com, quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com,
	andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, ben@...adent.org.uk,
	broonie@...nel.org, quic_wcheng@...cinc.com,
	krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, sumit.garg@...nel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 0/4] Support system sleep with offloaded usb transfers

On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 08:32:00PM +0800, Guan-Yu Lin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 6:56 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 08:23:06AM +0000, Guan-Yu Lin wrote:
> >
> > Is there a reason you aren't cc:ing the developers from a "big android
> > device company" that is currently testing and finding problems with this
> > patchset in their device testing?  I will require their signed-off-by or
> > tested-by in order to even consider accepting this patch series based on
> > the issues they seem to be finding with it in an
> > internal-company-bug-reporting-platform that I seem to be also copied
> > on.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> I'm not sure if the company wants to reveal its testing right now
> since the company raised the problem with the internal system. Hence,
> we still use the internal system to communicate with them. We
> understand that "signed-off-by"/"tested-by" tags are required to merge
> the code, so we'll keep working closely with multiple companies to
> achieve this.

Great, please do so for the next version you post.

thanks,

greg k-h