linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH wireless v1] Revert "wifi: mwifiex: Fix HT40 bandwidth issue."

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0706792a7d08d7bcfdf7fa929cd5f1afc80e3f19.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2025 13:40:41 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>, Brian Norris
	 <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>, 
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Chen
	 <jeff.chen_1@....com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless v1] Revert "wifi: mwifiex: Fix HT40 bandwidth
 issue."

On Thu, 2025-06-05 at 12:03 +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>
> 
> This reverts commit 34253084291cb210b251d64657958b8041ce4ab1.

I'm confused. If you want it reverted in wireless, this is the wrong
sha1? If you want bit only reverted in stable, why are you tagging it
for wireless?

johannes