linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH wireless v1] Revert "wifi: mwifiex: Fix HT40 bandwidth issue."

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250605121452.GA48603@francesco-nb>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 14:14:52 +0200
From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>,
	Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
	Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jeff Chen <jeff.chen_1@....com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless v1] Revert "wifi: mwifiex: Fix HT40 bandwidth
 issue."

On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 01:40:41PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-06-05 at 12:03 +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>
> > 
> > This reverts commit 34253084291cb210b251d64657958b8041ce4ab1.
> 
> I'm confused. If you want it reverted in wireless, this is the wrong
> sha1? If you want bit only reverted in stable, why are you tagging it
> for wireless?

Because I did a mistake :-( This is supposed to be reverted on Linus
tree, not just in stable, I'll send a v2 with this fixed, sorry.

Francesco