[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250605071240.7133d1a5@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 07:12:40 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jinjian Song <jinjian.song@...ocom.com>
Cc: andrew+netdev@...n.ch, angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
chandrashekar.devegowda@...el.com, chiranjeevi.rapolu@...ux.intel.com,
corbet@....net, danielwinkler@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, haijun.liu@...iatek.com, helgaas@...nel.org,
horms@...nel.org, johannes@...solutions.net, korneld@...gle.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
loic.poulain@...aro.org, m.chetan.kumar@...ux.intel.com,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
rafael.wang@...ocom.com, ricardo.martinez@...ux.intel.com,
ryazanov.s.a@...il.com
Subject: Re: [net-next v1] net: wwan: t7xx: Parameterize data plane RX BAT
and FAG count
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 17:17:22 +0800 Jinjian Song wrote:
> The parameters are used by data plane to request RX DMA buffers for the entrire lifetime of
> the driver, so it's best to determine them at the driver load time. Adjusting them after the
> driver has been probed could introduce complex issues (e.g., the DMA buffers may already be
> in use for communication when the parameters are changed. While devlink appears to support
> parameter configuration via driver reload and runtime adjustment, both of these occur after
> the driver has been probed, which doesn't seem very friendly to the overall logic.
no.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists